Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
(b) failed to take minimum safety management measures, such as the establishment of safe glass.
(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 5”) In the end, the Plaintiff provided various distance to customers who find C facilities and promoted D exhibitions to revitalize C facilities and increase sales. However, it was improper to conduct affairs such as securing budget, establishing business plans, shipping-in and management of works, etc.
As a result, on March 29, 201, the author who provided D works after the end of the exhibition provided the cause of a lawsuit for damages against the facility on March 29, 201, alleging that D1, which was displayed by the author who provided D works, was lost and destroyed by two points.
The Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
D. The main contents of the instant demotion are as follows: (a) the Defendant’s award penalty provisions; (b) the rules on the delegation of administrative affairs; and (c) the rules on the delegation of administrative affairs to C Facilities; and (d) the bylaws
* All employees of Article 6 (Duty of Good Faith) of the Employment Regulations must observe the Acts and subordinate statutes and the defendant's regulations and perform their duties faithfully.
* If an employee under Article 7 (Grounds for Disciplinary Action) of the Detailed Punishment Regulations (amended on December 28, 2010) falls under any of the following subparagraphs, he/she may be subject to disciplinary action:
1. When the defendant violates any order given by various kinds of provisions;
6. Article 8 (Kinds of Disciplinary Action) (1) When an auditor is recommended according to the result of audit and inspection, the types of disciplinary action are as follows, and minor disciplinary action means reprimand or salary reduction, and heavy disciplinary action means suspension from office or dismissal:
1. Reprimand,
2. Salary reduction;
3. Suspension from office,
(2) Criteria for the determination of disciplinary action under paragraph (1) shall be as set forth in attached Tables 1, 1-2, 1-3, 2, and 3.
Provided, That the personnel committee may determine irregularities that are not in accordance with the provisions of the attached Table in consideration of the degree thereof.
(3) If the personnel committee deems that the degree of misconduct of a person for whom a resolution on disciplinary action has been requested is weak, and that such misconduct has occurred in the course of faithfully and actively performing his/her duties due to negligence, it shall be severely punished or subject to the criteria for