The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On June 21, 2001, the summary of the charge is as follows: (a) around 17:33, the Defendant’s employee Gap, with respect to the Defendant’s service, violated the vehicle operation restriction by the road management authority by loading freight of more than 111.58t of more than 10t of 3 livestock storage capacity on the roads of the midline 3.2 km Branch Office in Busan East-dong Seoul-dong, Seoul-do Office of Business.

2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of January 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of December 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court on October 28, 2010, and accordingly, the said provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.

3. As the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of the judgment of the Defendant is publicly announced pursuant to Article 58