logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.06.11 2019고단7829
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of eight million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a security guard who provides security services, such as the protection of the personal safety of customers and employees, restraint of disturbing acts such as customers, etc., and maintenance of order in club facilities, in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government’s “D” club located under Defendant B, and Defendant B is a security business entity that is a legal entity that obtained a renewed license from the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency on April 23, 2013 and obtained a renewed license from the National Police Agency on June 26, 2018.

1. Defendant A

A. A. On October 28, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) (hereinafter “Joint Injury”) and, at around 04:17, at the second floor of the above club, there was a disturbance between the other security guards and the victim E (the age of 26) who is the customer, recommended the victim and the relevant person to leave the said club together with F, etc.

Accordingly, while the defendant and F was going up with the stairs leading to the entrance of the first floor with the victim, the victim, etc., the F was satisfing with the victim, and the victim was satisfing with the fat, and the victim was satisfing with the fat, and the defendant was satching for about three weeks of the victim's face by combining it with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant, together with F, injured the victim.

(b) Security guards who violate the Security Services Industry Act shall be prohibited from performing acts deviating from the scope of security services, such as exerting force on other persons or exercising physical power while performing their duties;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as a security guard, committed an act beyond the scope of the security service, while performing the security service, such as the facility security service of the above club and the protection of personal safety, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

2. The above A and F, the security guards belonging to the defendant B, are injured by the above E in performing security services, such as the time and place set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 1, the facility security service of the above club, the personal protection service, etc. at the place, and other security guards G.

arrow