A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of B rocketing private taxi.

On October 14, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on October 23:51, 2014, and led the Defendant to proceed to the intersection, which is the place of accident, along the two-lane straight from the straight line between the two-lanes in the straight line in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, to the 867 Twit-dong along the unification of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul.

Since four-dimensional signals are installed, and crosswalks are installed, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and to see the right and the right and the right of the road well and to proceed in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went beyond the ground by neglecting the fact that the vehicle driving signal is changed to the stop signal, and due to the negligence of driving as it is, the Defendant, according to pedestrian signals, had the front wheels part of the victim C (Seoul, 44 years old) driving on the right side of the crosswalk, which was driving on the right side of the crosswalk in accordance with pedestrian signals.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., the pelvis and the pelvise of the pelvise and the pelvise of the pelvise and the pelvise of the pelvise.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Each traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV perusal);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant, in violation of the notification of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, committed an injury to a victim by causing an accident, and committed the same offense in 192 and 2002, and the victim did not compensate for the injury and property damage caused by the accident.