1. The plaintiff's claim that was changed in exchange in this court is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The reasons why the court of this case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance are stated are as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition

▣ 제1심판결문 제2면 제6행 아래 추가 “한편 별지 목록 기재 부동산에 관하여 2016. 5. 23. 수원지방법원 안양지원 I로 부동산임의경매절차가 개시되어 2018. 12. 6. 경락되었고, 위 부동산에 관한 피고 명의의 근저당권설정등기가 말소되었다. 위 안양지원은 2019. 1. 9. ”실제 배당할 금액: 139,688,647원, 배당액: J조합 50,634,820원, 피고 88,324,931원, A 728,896원“인 배당표를 작성하였고, 같은 날 피고에게 위 88,324,931원을 배당하였다. ▣ 제1심판결문 제2면 제7행 중 “다툼 없는 사실, 변론 전체의 취지” “다툼 없는 사실, 갑 27, 43호증(가지번호 포함)의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지” ▣ 제1심판결문 제2면 제16, 17행 중 “송달받고서야 알게 되었다.

Therefore, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage of this case should be cancelled as the registration of the invalidation of the cause completed without any valid agreement.

“As it was known that the establishment registration of the instant establishment was made upon receipt, the registration of the establishment of the instant establishment is the registration of the invalidity of the cause completed without a valid agreement.

” ▣ 제1심판결문 제2면 제20, 21행 중 “원고는 이 사건 소를 제기함으로써 이를 취소하였다.

Therefore, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage of this case must be cancelled as the registration of invalidity of cause.

“The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and revoked it, and thus, the registration of the establishment of the instant neighboring mortgage is invalid.

(3) However, the Defendant received the aforementioned KRW 88,324,931 from the above auction procedure on the grounds of the registration of creation of a new mortgage of this case, which is null and void, and thus, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 88,324,931 and delay damages.