Text
1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months;
2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts (such as brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) (hereinafter “C”), Defendant 1 operated commercial sex acts in the name of “C” on the third floor of the building B in Osan-si, Osan-si. Around March 22:40, 2018, Defendant 2: D (the condition that each customer pays 30,000 won directly to his/her female employees) who visited the said business establishment by pretending to be a customer to the said business establishment on March 8, 2018; and 1.40,000 won from E’s cash (the condition that each customer pays 30,000 won to his/her female employees) and arranged F and G to engage in a similar act by having his/her female employees wear the sex of the said
2. No person in violation of the Educational Environment Protection Act shall operate a business to provide services in an educational environment protection zone where physical contacts between unspecified persons or sexual acts, such as exposure to sealed parts, are conducted, or any other similar acts are likely to be conducted;
Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) installed shower rooms and toilets separately; (b) on March 8, 2018, around 22:40, around 2018, the Defendant provided services that are likely to engage in physical contacts between unspecified persons or exposure to sealed parts, etc.; or (c) that are likely to engage in similar activities, by dividing them into a door and a wall at the above establishment located within approximately 187 meters from the boundary line of H elementary school; and (d) installed shower rooms and toilets separately; and (e) provided services that are likely to engage in physical contacts between unspecified persons or other similar activities.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement [it is alleged that the defendant did not arrange sexual traffic, but according to the evidence below, D and E do not have the same service as the defendant's "math and good service."
When "," the defendant does not have a superior who is Handbling.
Hand replyed to the purport that Hand would be a frier and a friend (other than friend fee) and be a 30,000 won per se, and E.