logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.21 2013고정58
음악산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant engaged in a singing practice room business with the trade name of “Dambling room” on the ground floor located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, and that from around 18:00 on December 4, 2012 to around 18:30 on the same day, the Defendant violated the rules of practice by selling alcoholic beverages worth a total of 12,000 won at the market price of 4 cans of beer, thereby violating the rules of practice room business operators.

2. Despite the direct evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, the defendant stated that he sold cans to customers E and F at the time according to their orders, and there are only one cans found in his room, the defendant consistently argued that from the beginning of the investigation to the court, he did not sell beer to customers and the cans found in the room will bring about E and F to gather themselves.

However, E and F, who testified to take an oath to be punished for perjury in the court, was aware that E and F, at the time of the initial testimony, was an employee of E and F, who concealed and concealed the fact that E was an employee of E and F. At the time of the initial testimony, it became recognized at the time of testimony after the middle of the year.

Furthermore, F testified that the Defendant was not reported, and E testified that there was no contact between the reporter and the reporter. However, through the communication confirmation meeting, it was revealed that both E and F sent telephone calls and text messages several times between the reporter G and the reporter G before and after the report. Through the witness G’s legal statement, G or E were employees related to entertainment taverns in the competitive business type, and G was under contact with the Defendant at the time of the instant case, and G was under contact with E and reported by receiving female letters at the time of the instant report.

After all, the testimony of E and F is a perjury because it was revealed that the police reported.

arrow