logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.05.15 2020고정15
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(비밀준수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment for the crime of indecent act by force in the Gwangju District Court’s wooden branch, and on November 28, 2015, the Defendant first registered personal information on January 25, 2016, which became final and conclusive on November 28, 2015.

Where the basic personal information submitted is changed, a person subject to registration of personal information shall submit the reason and details of the change to the head of the competent police office having jurisdiction over his/her domicile within

Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant registered a B K7 car on June 29, 2017, and scrapped the Crops car which was already registered on April 3, 2018 and changed the information on the vehicle that owned personal information, the Defendant did not submit the changed information to the head of the competent police office within 20 days from the date on which the cause for the change occurred without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of automobile registration certificate;

1. Other closure photographs of the personal information management screen;

1. Application of investigative reports (prior convictions and verifications of sex offenses by suspects);

1. Relevant Article on the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 50 (3) 2 and 43 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes concerning the Selection of Sexual Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order seems to have been insufficient to recognize that the defendant was subject to reporting, the fact that the defendant submitted a modified personal information after recognizing that he was subject to reporting, and the defendant did not seem to have a risk of recidivism of sexual crimes, etc. during the period of reporting or omitting reporting, and the fact that sexual crimes were not committed after being punished for sexual crimes in the judgment, and the punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow