logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.02 2013고단6322
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated by Defendant A.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From August 1, 2013 to September 10, 2013, A is the business owner operating "D" in the Seo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City 5 from around August 1, 2013, and Defendant B received KRW 400,000 per week from the employees of the said business place. The Defendants conspired to receive KRW 130,000 per man-made customers who were found in the said business place at the said time and place, received KRW 130,00 per man-made male customers who were employed in the said business place. The Defendants, in collusion, received KRW 130,00 for each man-made customers who were employed in the said business place, had the said female workers sexual intercourse with the said customers at the guest room, and received KRW 75,000,000 from the said female employees for the said period.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Each police interrogation protocol against E, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on Transactions in the Deposit Account (CF) (Defendant A);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. [Calculation of the amount of additional collection: 17,900,000 won [ =18,920,00 won [ =34 times x 55,00 won (the profits actually acquired by Defendant A once the arrangement of commercial sex acts)],]- Seized 1,020,00 won]; and

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Optional fine;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in the workhouse [Defendant A] is sentenced to the sentence in light of the following: (a) the Defendant committed a second offense again for not less than four months after the grace period has expired even though the Defendant was already sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the commission of sexual traffic; and (b) the Defendant did not have a considerable amount of

arrow