logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.04.24 2013고정3616
업무상과실치상
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was a technician in charge of the construction of a window frame for E-building in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, a Co., Ltd.; and (b) around 13:30 on March 22, 2013, at the second floor of the construction site, installed a window (Ga 8m, 2m 50m high, 70km in weight) along with the victim F (the age of 49). As the victim was aware of the fact that there was a part of the window in the inside of the building, and thus, there was a duty of care to prevent the deterioration of the window from falling.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take necessary measures as above, and had the victim, who was using the window frame above the window at several times in order to meet the location of the above window installation, fell from the window to the floor with the window, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the cage cage cage and the bones embarnes, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to copies of diagnosis certificates;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (the fact that the defendant reflects the crime of this case in depth, the defendant did not have any record of crime, and the defendant submitted to this court a written agreement containing the victim's intent not to punish the victim after agreement with the victim during the trial of this case) is higher than that of this Court.

arrow