All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the Defendants (two years of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment, one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendants did not have the history of punishment for the same crime, and the crime of this case was committed seriously against the Defendants, and they deposited part of the amount of damage for the victims when they came to the trial. However, the crime of this case was committed in a planned manner by the Defendants that stolen a considerable amount of oil by drilling the hole on the oil pipelines, and the nature and circumstances of the crime are heavy, and the amount deposited by the Defendants is insufficient to recover damage. Considering the fact that the Defendants did not reach an agreement with the victims and other circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, including the age, character, environment, family relationship, etc. of the Defendants, the punishment imposed by the lower court against the Defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants’ assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.