Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the case after an accident) and the Road Traffic Act (or the case after an accident) led the Defendant to the left-hand turn to the intersection of the 211st century from the south-gu Sea Disease at the time of the port by driving a CBelgium car at around 06:45 on November 10, 2016.
At this point, there has been an intersection with a signal apparatus, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to make it possible to report the signal apparatus to the intersection and to prevent the accident in advance by driving the vehicle as ordered by the signal apparatus.
In such a situation, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn left the left, and caused the collision between the victim D (46C) and the victim D (46C) under green signals in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding at around that time, and the remaining parts of the E E E E E E E E E car, which was driven by the Defendant’s green signals, were the front part of the left part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, did the victim F(71) who was on board the victim D and the damaged passenger car (71 tax), the victim G(71 tax), and the victim H(37 tax) receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and did not immediately stop the damaged vehicle so that the amount equivalent to KRW 1,598,810 is damaged to the repair cost, and did not take necessary measures such as providing relief to the damaged person.
2. A person who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.133% at a distance of about 10km from the distance of 10km to the front side of the school which is invoked in the Yong-gu, Yan-dong bus terminal at the same time and time as indicated in paragraph 1.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. A photo at the scene of an accident and a survey report on the actual condition of a traffic accident;
1. Each written diagnosis;
1. Details of damage adjustment;
1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of notification of the situation report on drivers of drinking and the results of crackdown on drinking driving.