logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.15 2017누32786
종합소득세부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, in addition to the dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

Part which is dismissed or added shall be referred to as the "Witness" in Part 18 of the Judgment of the first instance as the "Witness of the first instance court".

After the judgment of the court of first instance No. 4, the 19th "no." is added to the following: "No. 37 through 48, 50, 51 [the same shall apply even if the plaintiff bears each description of Gap's evidence (including a serial number) additionally submitted by the court of first instance."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow