1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 145,00,000 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its payment from June 23, 2015 to June 10, 2016.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 4, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant indicated the “Dupuping” building and site (hereinafter “instant real estate”) of the Defendant’s operation in Gangwon-gun C, Gangwon-do, as the Plaintiff’s son, but the actual purchaser indicated it as the Plaintiff’s son, but the actual purchaser indicated it as the Plaintiff when indicating the purchaser (hereinafter “the Plaintiff”).

The sales contract was concluded to purchase KRW 245 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. The Plaintiff paid to the Defendant KRW 25 million as the down payment at the time of the conclusion of the instant sales contract, and paid KRW 10 million on May 4, 2014, and the same month.

5. 10 million won, and the same month.

6. Around May 15, 2014, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant received KRW 75 million as part payments. Around 15, 2014, the Defendant filed a claim for the remainder of KRW 145 million through a counterclaim. The remainder of KRW 145 million was paid as part payments but the Defendant received KRW 75 million as part payments (the remainder of KRW 145 million = the total purchase price - KRW 245 million - the down payment - KRW 25 million - the remainder payment - the remainder payment - KRW 75 million - the remainder of the remainder of the remainder of the real estate, which the Defendant received as part payments of KRW 75 million, and the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of Plaintiff 1’s neighboring real estate under the name of Plaintiff 4,2015, which was located at approximately 14,500,000,000,000,000,000).

)A cafeteria building (hereinafter referred to as “cafeteria building”) which is a second class neighborhood facility in the second class pent of the wooden typlate roof and H located.

) and housing buildings located in I (hereinafter referred to as “J building”)

The plaintiff was the plaintiff.