logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.10.10 2013고단951
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 22, 2013, from around 03:00 to around Jeju, the Defendant drinked the vessel C and alcohol from the bathing beach in Jeju, and driven a car under the influence of alcohol.

At around 06:27 on the same day, the Defendant received an order to stop from G in front of the old pellet restaurant in Jeju-si, who was called “intoxicated vehicle” on the road in front of the old peltom cafeteria, and was dispatched to the scene of the D patrol lane, the Jeju Western Police Station E District Unit, F and Police Officer, who was called to the scene of the D patrol lane, but escaped by disregarding the fear of punishment for drunk driving.

Accordingly, police officers have concealed the defendant who escaped from Jeju, and began to attack the Jeju Nowon-gu Nowon-gu, Interlocking, and Ara Dong from that time.

1. Around 06:20 on July 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 10 K 0.168% from the section of about 10 K to the road front of the Lao elementary school, which was located in the Dong-dong, Jeju-si, Jeju-si to 06:40 on the same day.

2. Around 06:33 on the same day, the Defendant was unable to stop the way of escape due to an influence vehicle facing the UMour, which is linked to Jeju-si, during the escape.

Accordingly, the police officers assigned patrol cars to the Defendant after the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and the Defendant, as part of the back part of the said vehicle, which is a dangerous object by intentionally moving back to the Defendant, had the police officers take two or three times in front of the patrol car, and caused the shock, so far as approximately 1.5 meters back of the patrol car, the police officers attempted to abscond again by using the gap.

Accordingly, the defendant interferes with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the maintenance of order using the above car, which is a dangerous object, and the patrol car, which is a object used by public offices, is 468.

arrow