The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged and ordered the collection of KRW 125,074,500.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on criminal proceeds and additional collection.

The argument that the judgment below erred by infringing on the essential contents of the principle of balance between crimes and the principle of responsibility constitutes the argument of unfair sentencing.

However, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing

In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.