[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

No person who has registered fee-charging job placement services shall allow another person to conduct job placement services using his/her name or trade name, or lend his/her registration certificate to another person, and shall be the other party.

1. From April 2013 to April 2014, Defendant A conducted fee-charging job placement services by obtaining permission for the use of the trade name of E job placement office from Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and the second floor E job placement office, and practically operating E job placement office from registered titleholder B.

2. Defendant B, as a representative in the name of the E Job Placement Office, allowed A to use the Defendant’s trade name at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, thereby allowing A to conduct fee-charging job placement services using the Defendant’s trade name of E Job Placement Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some statements of each police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each statement made by the police officer in relation to F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, and N;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each internal investigation report and each investigation report;

1. A copy of each labor contract, a copy of each cash borrowed letter, a certificate of transaction, a certificate of transaction, an advertisement for job placement of an E job placement office, a copy of each passbook, a certificate of job placement service, a registration of fee-charging job placement services, a register of employees of the E job placement office

1. A copy of the E Job Placement Office (A), the photo of the seizure site (the defendant and his defense counsel actually operated the E Job Placement Office and the defendant A did not allow the defendant Eul to lend his name to the defendant Eul, and the defendant Eul did not allow the defendant Eul to provide job placement services. However, in full view of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court (a evidence of investigation record 297-298, 443-44, 558-561, 592-5, 974-975, 1043-1045, 1362-1368, the defendant Eul allowed the defendant Eul to use the defendant's trade name around April 2013, and the defendant Eul also allowed the defendant Eul to use the defendant's trade name.