The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Reasons for appeal;

A. In fact, on May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) under a contract with the victim E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) under the name of H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “H”); (b) from G hotel construction works located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (c) changed the underground room to steel reinforced concrete with the system distribution; (b) changed the guest room toilets from the early to the steel reinforced concrete; (c) changed to the apartment room with the second to the second to the second to six floors; (d) increased the structure of the apartment room from the 6th to the 18th to the 18th floor; and (d) did not require additional construction works for the purpose of calculating the remainder of the construction cost; and (d) the victim did not have any justifiable reason for the remainder of the construction cost for the purpose of calculating the construction cost from the date of the Plaintiff’s right to the rest of the 8th floor to the 6th floor to the 18th floor; and (d) did not require additional construction works from the public office.

B. The punishment of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts in detail, and based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court and the lower court, the lower court’s determination on the Defendant’s assertion of misunderstanding of facts. In so doing, the Defendant’s civil petition is filed with the victim who obtained the approval of the use.