The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one and half years of imprisonment for a maximum term of one year and six months, and one year of short term) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is against the defendant's confession of the crime of this case, the defendant's character, environment, family relations, and circumstances after the crime of this case are considered to be unfair since the punishment of the court below is too too unreasonable, considering the following circumstances: the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case, despite the fact that he had been subject to juvenile protective disposition by larceny over several times in the past; the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victims of the crime of this case; the defendant continued to commit the crime of this case although he was investigated by an investigative agency; the defendant committed the crime of this case; the crime of this case is not good in light of the frequency of the crime of this case, the number of the crimes of this case; and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing of this case, such as character, conduct, environment, family relations, and circumstances after the crime. Thus, the above argument of the defendant cannot be

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[In accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, on September 23, 201, the first part of the criminal facts of the judgment of the court below [the defendant] was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for larceny from the former District Prosecutors' Office on September 23, 201; on January 30, 2012, juvenile protective disposition (Article 32 (1) 5 and 8 of the Juvenile Act) was issued by the former District Court on January 30, 201; and on September 24, 2012, the former District Court issued a juvenile protective disposition as a protective disposition for larceny.

“AH in the fifth second sentence out of the summary of the evidence is “X”, and the fifth second sentence in the application of the statute is the “2013.” As the “2103.” in the second and first sentence of the second sentence is each “2013.”