logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2018.06.12 2018고단22
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 20, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Jeonju District Court on September 20, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeonju prison on July 31, 2013.

1. On June 2, 2015, the Defendant against the Victim B was in the management office of “D” in the Namwon-si, Namwon-si, Seoul. Around June 2, 2015, the Defendant punished the Victim B with a large amount of money by making investments in the company that gave money to the bad credit holders while working in a speedless manner. However, the Defendant would incur a large amount of money to make investments in the subject.

It is expected to pay interest of at least KRW 200,000 per month of investment money of KRW 3 million.

If an investment is not made, it is intended to ask for the payment in lieu of the investment.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have made an investment in the company lending money to the bad credit holders, and even if the Defendant received money from the injured party as a means of investment, it was intended to consume such money for the purpose of his/her own living expenses, so there was no intention or ability to pay interest on the investment money or return the principal.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received from the victim, the personal compromise in the name of the victim, from the victim, KRW 3 million on June 2, 2015, KRW 3 million on or around August 11, 2015, KRW 1 million on or around August 16, 2015, KRW 4 million on or around September 10, 2015, and acquired the total amount of KRW 11 million on or around September 10, 2015.

2. On August 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) from Namwon-si, Namwon-si; (b) from the introduction of the above B, the Defendant made a false statement with the content as described in paragraph (1).

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have made an investment in the company lending money to the bad credit holders, and even if the Defendant received money from the injured party as a means of investment, it was intended to consume such money for the purpose of his/her own living expenses, so there was no intention or ability to pay interest on the investment money or return the principal.

The Defendant is the victim.

arrow