logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.05.27 2015가합579300
분양대금 반환
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

. As a large number of advertisements, it was advertised that it is possible to create high rental earnings if invested in the instant officetel.

The details of the advertisement made by the Defendant in recruiting buyers of the instant officetel are as follows.

(1) The defendant's advertisement details: ① Foreigner's exclusive rental house (U.S.) (2)one-third-year rental house (U.S. rental house (U.S.) is transferred directly to the account of a lessor in charge of the safety of the conclusion of a contract with the U.S. military and the U.S. military-related enterprise housing management). ② The 90% of the U.S. military-unit rental house is transferred to Pyeongtaek by 2016 * the 44,000 U.S. military and his family members, etc. (the 40,000 U.S. military and the 80,000 U.S. military-unit rental house) is the maximum rental base of the U.S., U.S. military-unit * Life-long rental house without changing the demand for lifelong rent * The 15,000 U.S. military-unit rental house (the 15-year rental house of this case). The 15-year rental house of this case is the average rental rate of 1810,014,0000.

C. The Plaintiffs agreed to the Defendant after the Defendant completed the instant officetel.

arrow