1. On December 29, 2017, the Defendant confirmed that the two-month disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, which was taken against the Plaintiff, is null and void.

2. The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a company that issues and sells the press, etc., and the Plaintiff is a person who works for the Defendant on January 1, 1996 and was dismissed on October 6, 201 and reinstated on January 11, 201.

B. On October 6, 2011, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the dismissal. 2) On October 6, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that the dismissal disposition on October 6, 201 constituted an unfair dismissal, and filed an application for unfair dismissal application with the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission for remedy and remedy for unfair labor practices.

On December 12, 2011, the Seoul Regional Labor Relations Commission ruled that the application for remedy against unfair dismissal was accepted, and that the application for remedy against unfair labor practices was dismissed.

On March 14, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant filed an application for review of the first inquiry tribunal, and the National Labor Relations Commission revoked the first inquiry tribunal and dismissed the application for remedy from unfair dismissal and the application for review of unfair labor damage remedy.

3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Chairperson of the Seoul Administrative Court seeking the revocation of the review decision. The court held that the Defendant, even though some of the grounds for disciplinary action as listed below are deemed to have exceeded or abused discretion (Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2012Guhap11942, May 2, 2013). (1) - The Plaintiff’s filing of false suspicions against management and insult - the Plaintiff’s posting of a notice as indicated in the attached Form on the Trade Union website or the internal computer network on May 26, 2011 - the Plaintiff’s issuing the “statement of reasons for removal” to the directors of the D Foundation on September 29, 2011 - the Plaintiff posted the “E” notice on the Nowon’s website or the internal computer network on September 26, 2011 - the Plaintiff’s unauthorized release of inside materials - the Plaintiff’s internal information leakage to the directors of the D Foundation on May 26, 2011 - the Plaintiff’s internal investment funds lending contract (hereinafter “Defendant”).