The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the event of the instant accident, the Defendant committed the instant accident outside of the Defendant’s business scope, even though he fulfilled his duty of care within his business scope.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing (one million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant was negligent in his duty of care to prevent the loss to the victim due to the defendant's negligence, and the defendant's negligence can be sufficiently recognized, since the defendant's assertion is not reasonable, since he was negligent in performing his duty of care to prevent the customer from being neglected, such as immediately removing the floor level of the floor, as he was engaged in the maintenance, operation, safety management, etc. as the leader of the food and business management team of the C hotel Holdings at the time of the instant case.

1 이 사건 사고가 발생한 날은 웨딩홀에 예식이 있었던 토요일로, 뷔페식당에도 하객들이 붐볐던 것으로 보이는 점, 이 사건 사고가 발생한 장소는 음료 코너 앞이었는데, 당시 물과 음료수가 바닥에 흘러내려 미끄러운 상태였던 점, 이 사건 호텔의 관리팀장으로 근무하였던 G은 당심 법정에서, ‘이 사건 뷔페식당의 바닥 재질은 타일로 되어 있으나, 다른 뷔페식당도 바닥이 타일로 되어 있는 곳이 있다’, '이 사건 피해자는 바닥에 있는 물기나 떨어진 음식물을 밟아서 미끄러진 것으로 보이고, 바닥에 이물질이 없다면 사람이 미끄러지지...