logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.05.08 2014고단131
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in driving a leisure vehicle B.

On January 22, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded at a speed of 20-30 km from the right angle to the right angle in the right angle to the right angle in the right direction at a speed of 20-10 km from the right angle to the right angle in the right direction while under the influence of 0.140% of the blood alcohol concentration.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, there was a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving service thoroughly and safely drive the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the center line as it was by negligence, which caused the victim C (the age of 59) who was under normal operation in the opposite part, received the front part of the driver's vehicle in front of the above ready-light vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim C and the victim E (V, 54 years old) of the above damaged vehicle by occupational negligence in order to obtain satisfys, etc. in need of treatment for each three-day period, and damaged the damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,131,346, repair cost.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) in the state of alcohol by 0.140% of blood alcohol concentration at the section of approximately 700 meters from the front of Es.S. 1 to the front road of the J. S. 626-1 of the J. S. 26-1 at the right time of the reasonable border.

3. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the above Paragraph 1, has driven a passenger car B which was not covered by the automobile mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual condition of the traffic accident, the report on the actual status of the driver, and the report on the actions against the driver;

arrow