logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.04.10 2011가단88456
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On March 20, 198, Nonparty B transferred a building and land located in Ansan-si, a member of the Gu of Ansan-si, but without filing a report, and the head of the Suwon-si Tax Office under the Plaintiff notified the imposition of capital gains tax on January 2, 2001. The head of the tax office under the Plaintiff notified the payment period on January 2, 2001. The above B notified the imposition of global income tax and value-added tax on November 30, 2001 by filing a non-payment without filing a report on the loan interest and the loan income and real estate sales income for the period from 1996 to 2000.

B transferred from the Defendant’s new bank account (D) to the Defendant’s bank account, KRW 5,00,000 on March 17, 2011, KRW 3,000,000 on March 18, 2011, KRW 20,000,00 on June 5, 2011, and KRW 18,680,000 on June 13, 201, to the Defendant A’s account under the name of his spouse and the new bank account (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant accounts”).

Evidence No. 2, 14, 200, 00 won No. 5, 17, 17, 201, No. 5,000 won evidence of account account in the name of the defendant as of March 17, 201, No. 3,000,000 won No. 3,000 on March 18, 201, 201, No. 3,000 won No. 3, 6,000,000 won as of June 13, 201, No. 13, 3,680,000 won as of June 12, 201, No. 580,00 won as evidence of account in the name of the defendant, and No. 4 [Grounds for recognition] of the parties’ respective arguments and arguments in Gap bank G No. 1 through 7 (including each number number; hereinafter the same shall apply) as well as the parties’ respective arguments and arguments in excess of the parties’ respective arguments.

It constitutes a fraudulent act because the defendant donated a total of KRW 46,680,000 to the defendant by means of remittance as described in the paragraph.

Therefore, each of the above gift contracts shall be revoked, and the defendant shall pay the plaintiff the above 46,680,000 won and damages for delay.

The defendant's assertion is the defendant.

arrow