logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.01.30 2018고단1016
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for a period of ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around January 2015, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D, Defendant A made a statement to the purport that “I would obtain profits of KRW 500 million from the investment of KRW 150 million in the land for the development of electric power supply housing in Yongsan-si E.” The Defendant A made a statement to the effect that “I would like to prepare money and divide the profits from the development of the development project. I would like to say, “I would like to have F with the financing power, F with the financing power, provide F with the use of BM 7 vehicles, and borrow money for the purchase of the land for the land for the development of the electric power supply housing in Pakistan-si. I would need to obtain a long-term lease of the said vehicle. If F would have a maximum amount of KRW 400-50 million,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000 won for surplus funds, as the purchase price of the land.”

On February 2015, Defendant A tried to operate a business to develop an electric resource complex by purchasing land located in the strike with B with the victim F in the middle of the above house, and Defendant A stated to the effect that “I will pay 7.5% of the profit rate as interest, 80 million won of the investment principal, and 45 days after the loan of money. I would also allow BM7 passenger cars to use BM7 passenger cars.”

However, in fact, even though the defendants had been to use for the real estate development project at the time of strike, the amount was 150 million won by deceiving the victim to use for the real estate development project, and the cost used by the defendants in relation to the real estate development is limited to 30 million won due to unclearness as to whether the above real estate development project was implemented, and the defendants were to provide money from the victim F with the lease cost and personal card price of the motor vehicle to be provided to the victim.

arrow