A fine of KRW 3,00,00 for each fraud against the victim D, E, and F in the holding of the Defendant, G, H, I, and F.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 16, 2012 from the Suwon District Court on imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months in a crime of fraud, and the judgment was finalized on October 24, 2012.

[2017 High Order 665] On October 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a request from the victim I, who was the second half of 2014, to “A person who was sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually

1. The Defendant committing the crime against the victim G in a place where it is unknown on October 16, 2014, by telephone to the victim G (32 years) at a place where it is unknown on October 16, 2014, sent the commission to appoint counsel for the robbery rape case.

different types.

“.......”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the injured party, he only thought that he will use it for his personal purpose, such as living expenses, and did not have the intention or ability to appoint a lawyer.

On October 17, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 6 million won from the victim, to a new bank account in the name of the Defendant’s father-R on October 17, 2014, and acquired 47,338,956 won in total over 14 times, as shown in the attached Table 1 List of Crimes.

2. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant sent to the victim H (here, 37 years of age) a telephone call that “an additional attorney-at-law should be appointed from the attorney’s office to the case of attempted rape of O” to the victim H at a place where it is not known around October 21, 2014.

(b) the term “assumed;”

However, even if the defendant receives the above money from the injured party, he only thought that he will use it for his personal purpose such as living expenses, and he did not have any intention or ability to appoint an additional lawyer forO.

The defendant.