All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1 did not commit a theft of a bicycle owned by the victim E. (2) The lower court’s punishment (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

B. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, it is sufficient to recognize that the defendant steals the bicycles of the victims stated in the facts charged other than the victim E. 2) The sentence of the court below (one million won of fine) is too unfeasible and unfair.

2. 피고인의 사실오인 주장에 대한 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ① 피해자 E은 자신의 아팔란치아 자전거 1대를 잃어버린 점, ② 피고인의 집에서 같은 기종의 자전거가 발견된 점, ③ 피해자 E은 피고인의 집에서 발견된 위 자전거에 자신의 자전거의 뒷바퀴에 있었던 스크래치 자국과 동일한 자국이 있었다고 원심 법정에서 증언한 점, ④ 피고인은 위 자전거를 언제 누구로부터 얼마에 샀는지에 관하여 아무런 자료도 제시하지 못하고 있는 점 등을 종합하여 보면, 피고인이 피해자 E 소유의 아팔란치아 자전거 1대를 절취한 사실을 인정하기에 충분하므로, 피고인의 위 주장은 이유 없다.

3. If a large number of bicycles and bicycle parts are discovered at the defendant's office in the judgment of mistake of facts regarding prosecutor's assertion of mistake (excluding the victim E's bicycle discovered at the defendant's office and the victim E's bicycle discovered at the defendant's office), and if the defendant fails to present particular data on the circumstances where many bicycles and bicycle parts were possessed, it is highly doubtful that the defendant's above 42 bicycles are not stolen as stated in the facts charged of this case.

However, the facts charged of this case are 42 cases owned by the victims stated in the facts charged.