logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2012.08.24 2012고단786
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around November 20, 2010, the fraud Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I would develop search and color programs, and would change development costs,” to the victim’s “E” office located in the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building 401-2.

However, even if the Defendant received the program development cost from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to develop the program necessary for the said “E” business.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim, made a false contract with F, a professional money, and made and presented a false contract as if he/she had concluded a program development contract, deceiving the victim by deceiving him/her, and received KRW 4,835,00 from the victim’s female G bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant’s female G bank (H) in the name of program development cost, and transferred to the Defendant’s bank account (I) again, and received KRW 8,703,000 on May 29, 201, and received KRW 3,868,000 from G account to the Defendant’s bank account and received KRW 8,703,00,000 in total

2. On June 16, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00, at the 15:00 establishment of a document computer system for the first floor underground of the Mapo-gu Seoul National Health Insurance Corporation, Mapo-gu, Seoul, with office supplies, such as a string, which amounting to 1.2 million won of the market price owned by the victim C; and (b) loaded the 1 ton vehicle parked at the parking lot on the ground of the above Corporation.

3. Around September 201, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant produced “K”’s “K”’s “K”’s “K” office at the end of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J 2’s end of September, 201, and produced the Defendant’s “E”’s “K”’s “E”’s “E” as it was, thereby causing confusion to the customer’s business performance, etc., thereby interfering with the victim’s business operation by deceptive means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of L;

1.F.

arrow