A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

Since a public prosecution against assault and intimidation among the facts charged in the instant case is dismissed, it shall be appropriately revised to the extent that the facts charged against the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury, etc.) and the crime of causing property damage, which are related to the dismissal of the indictment with the original indictment

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) was a person in a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (the victim was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim C (the age of 36) on March 3, 2020, when the victim reported to the Jinhae Police Station to the Jinhae Police Station and received an investigation, the victim reported the victim's head to the police station on March 3, 202 to the effect that "the victim was able to solve the problem." However, on March 8, 2020, the victim got an adequate appraisal because the victim did not hear the horses. At around 07:30 on March 8, 2020, the victim was able to take a desire for the victim again and withdraw the complaint, but the victim was intending to sleep with the victim while refusing the complaint, and the victim was able to suffer damage to the victim's head and part of the victim's sexual health therapy, etc. (the victim's sexual injury).

As a result, the defendant injured the victim for the purpose of retaliation against the provision of investigation orders, such as a criminal complaint, in connection with the investigation of his criminal case.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at around 10:10 on March 8, 202, said that he would pay the unpaid mobile phone fee to the victim who had suffered injury at the hospital, as described in paragraph (1), but the victim would have refused to re-take the injury and attempted to bring the accident into the safe room. However, on the ground that there was a defect in the victim’s market in the living room in the living room, the market price, which is the victim’s ownership, will go beyond the margin.