logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2016.08.31 2015가합100845
약정금
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 120,000,000, and Defendant B with respect thereto from February 17, 2015, and Defendant C.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status 1) The Plaintiff, E, F, and G (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”)

H, I, J, K ground L Apartment (one Dong, 18 households, hereinafter referred to as “instant apartment”) at the time of J, I, J, and K

(2) Defendant D is the husband of N who is registered as the representative director of M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”) and is involved in the management of the said company among new construction works, and Defendant C is the head of the site office at the site of new construction of the instant apartment, and Defendant B is the major shareholder of Defendant D.

B. On January 4, 2010, M obtained a decision to permit the sale of the apartment of this case from the Daejeon District Court’s Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court, P(Joint) real estate auction. 2) At the time when M was subject to the said decision to permit the sale of the apartment of this case, 22 persons reported a lien on the apartment of this case. Accordingly, M received an order to manage the real estate of this case on January 13, 2010 from among 10 households (201, 401, 402, 701, 702, 802, 901, 902, 902, 902, 101, 101, 1001, 1001, 1002, 1002, 601, and Q21, 601, 502, and 602, among the apartment of this case. However, other generations (207, 301, 501, Q21, 65, etc.

C. The Defendants, who were involved in the waiver of the lien and the second real estate management enforcement 1) were to have been involved in the management of M, shall listen to the speech that they would borrow the successful bid price when the problem of the lien regarding the apartment of this case is resolved from the KCAF, and shall not receive the delivery at the time of the execution of the above real estate management among the apartment of this case (202, 302, 302, 501, 502, 601, 602, and 602, hereinafter “six households of this case”).

with respect to the plaintiff, etc. who was exercising the right of retention.

arrow