logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.05.13 2014가합206491
종중임시총회결의 부존재 또는 무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The chairperson A and A of the defendant at the special meeting of the clan of April 27, 2014 of the defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the defendant is a clan consisting of descendants who jointly set up the 19-year-old descendants of R trial and the plaintiff is the defendant's clans.

B. At the time of March 28, 2014, on April 27, 2014, the Defendant’s clan 37 members, including K, demanded the Plaintiff, as the president of the Defendant, to convene an extraordinary general meeting, stating as the case, “as of March 28, 2014, the case of re-election against executive officers, whether the decision was made unfairly cancelled, whether the trust property redemption was made in the name of the deceased U, the case of recovery of cash of KRW 70 million in custody of the deceased U family, and other cases of handling other items.”

2. Place: Written (cafeteria) located in Pyeongtaek-si V of Gyeonggi-do;

3. 1) Amendment of the articles of incorporation to a certain director in 2014 201 2) 3) amendment to the articles of incorporation: (i) amendment to the previous articles of incorporation 4) amendment of the following: (ii) amendment to the previous articles of incorporation 6) incumbent executives, incumbent executives, 7) amendment to the term of office 8) other matters 2). On April 12, 2014, the Plaintiff, as the Defendant’s chairperson, notified the Defendant’s senior members of the convening of the extraordinary general meeting 3) on April 27, 2014, the following matters: (iii) amendment to the articles of incorporation 4: (iv) amendment to the previous articles of incorporation 6); (v) amendment to the previous articles of incorporation 6); (vii) amendment to the current articles of incorporation 7); (vii) amendment to the term of office 7) amendment to the term of office 2014 ; (iv) amendment to the Plaintiff, as the Defendant’s president, submitted a notice of convening the extraordinary general meeting 3);

4 With respect to the operation, property, etc. of the Defendant clan, the Plaintiff and K were divided into the Plaintiff and K side, and there was a dispute between them. Accordingly, the Plaintiff and K asked P prior to the commencement of the instant special meeting to assign the Speaker pro tempore in charge of the instant special meeting, and P accepted it.

The plaintiff is the president of the special meeting of this case.

arrow