beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 4,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 16, 2010 to June 5, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts premised on the premise;
A. From December 1993, the Plaintiff was in office for about 18 years as a member of the clan C (hereinafter “Class C”)’s general director, and the Defendant was in office as a member of the clan C’s general director during the Plaintiff’s total term of office.
B. Around January 15, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the branch office of the family-friendly association (Seoul Metropolitan Government D3rd floor E office); (b) “the Plaintiff, as a general manager of the family-friendly association, arbitrarily utilized the proceeds from selling the land owned by the family-friendly association while independently managing the property of the family-friendly association; (c) sold the land owned by the family-friendly association at a lower level than the neighboring market price; and (d) sold the land owned by the family-friendly association at a lower level than the neighboring market price, thereby causing damage to the family-friendly association; and (e) completed the registration of ownership transfer for part of the land owned by the family-friendly association under the name of the president of the family-friendly association and embezzled the proceeds therefrom by using the proceeds thereof; and (e) sent several letters to the president of the family-friendly association, and sent them by mail to the members of the family-friendly association.”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings
2. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 4 and 1 evidence Nos. 4 and 1 of the liability for damages, the Defendant was convicted of the facts constituting a crime that damages the Plaintiff’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by preparing and sending the call-up of the special meeting of this case, and the judgment became final and conclusive.
The contents of the Plaintiff’s report on the convening of the instant special meeting are contents that may undermine the social evaluation of the Plaintiff’s character, credit, and other personal values within the clan by explicitly indicating the execution details as a general secretary of the clan. Therefore, the Defendant’s instant case.