logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.14 2016가단519290
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, from February 20, 2014, and Defendant C, from February 20, 2014, as well as KRW 1,500,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, from January 2007, operated a personal broadcast in the name of “E” (hereinafter “instant broadcast”) from the Internet Personal Broadcasting Africa to the clinic of “D” from January 2007.

나. 피고 B은 2014. 2. 20. 이 사건 방송에 접속하여 불특정 다수의 시청자들이 보고 있는 공개채팅창에 ‘D님섹-스해주세요 ♡빠라드릴께요’라는 글을 게시하였다.

C. The Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against Defendant B, and on April 29, 2015, the prosecutor of the Suwon District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition of suspending prosecution on the condition that the juvenile flight prevention center education was completed, on the grounds that Defendant B is a juvenile who is the primary offender and is against the law.

피고 C는 2014. 3. 11.경 이 사건 방송에 접속하여 불특정 다수의 시청자들이 보고 있는 공개채팅창에 ‘누나어디야 나콘돔사갈게’, ‘�♥’, ‘♡나발기안풀려 책임져’, ‘ㅅㅂ누나♡섹시해’, ‘미치겠다 ’, ‘하고싶어누나랑’이라고 게시하였다. 라.

On May 21, 2015, the plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the defendant C, and the prosecutor of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office suspended prosecution on the ground that the defendant C is the first offender and is against the law.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants used a language that is indecent to the open hosting of Internet personal broadcasting that enables an unspecified number of people to confirm the contents of the writing, thereby insulting the plaintiff. Since it is obvious in light of the empirical rule that the plaintiff suffered mental pain, the defendants are obliged to do so in money.

Furthermore, regarding the amount of consolation money, the contents, amount and frequency of the comments posted by the Defendants, the background and intent of the notices, the status and age of the original Defendant, criminal punishment, and other arguments in this case.

arrow