The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

According to the reasoning, the court below found the victim not guilty of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes among the facts charged in this case on the ground that the victim's vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at approximately 20 kilometers in speed, the victim's statement in the court of first instance stating that "the vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident, the vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the victim's "the vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident and the damaged part of the accident caused by the accident at the time of the accident," and that the victim's vehicle at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at the time of the accident at

According to the records, it is revealed that the speed of each vehicle at the time of the accident of this case is not fast and it was merely a contact with slurburgs, so that the degree of shock was very low, and that the diagnosis was also carried out by light salt, etc., and the treatment thereafter seems to be the same as well. D, in relation to the cause of pain, stated that it was very unreasonable for the victim to drive the defendant at the court of first instance as well as because it was caused by a tension. In addition, in light of the relevant legal principles, it is difficult to readily conclude that the victims suffered injury under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act due to the accident of this case even if the victims were to take more place at the hospital after the date of the accident, and thus, it is difficult to conclude that the victims suffered injury under Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act due to the accident of this case among the charges of this case.