1. Defendant D Co., Ltd. shall be 38,134,920 won for Plaintiff A and 38,625,105 won for Plaintiff B and each of the above amounts.

1. The plaintiffs' claim against defendant D

A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff”)

Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) in 2015

) The buildings located in the Incheon Strengthening Group E (hereinafter referred to as “instant buildings”) and the buildings

(2) The Plaintiff B did not receive KRW 38,134,920 for the construction work of the instant building with respect to the construction work of the instant company and the construction work of the instant building as KRW 187,82,80 for the construction work, but did not receive KRW 38,625,105 for the construction work.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 5-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant Company is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff Company the amount of 38,134,920 won for the construction work, the amount of 38,625,105 won for the construction work, and each of the above amounts, to the Plaintiff Company, 15% per annum from March 7, 2019 to May 31, 2019, which is the day following the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, and 12% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. At the time of concluding each contract on the interior works of the building of this case and the building of this case with the defendant company, the defendant C awarded a contract to the plaintiffs as joint contracting parties with the defendant company that the representative director is the defendant company and the joint contracting parties, and the defendant C must pay the unpaid construction price jointly with the defendant company.

However, each of the evidence Nos. 4-1, 2, and 5-1, 2, and 6-1, 2, 7, and 8-1, 6-2, and 7-8 is insufficient to recognize the fact that Defendant C contracted the work to the Plaintiffs jointly with the Defendant Company, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiffs' assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion of the Plaintiffs.