A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 22, 2016, at the F cafeteria located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim G, an employee of the Defendant, to be free from drinking alcohol and food; (b) however, on the ground that the victim did not have a walk, he/she did not calculate the drinking value; and (c) for about 45 minutes, the Defendant was unable to calculate the amount of money for about 45 minutes, without calculating the drinking value.

Qususususus flusus

The victim interfered with the business of the restaurant of the victim by force, such as continuing to see and seeing that he or she continues to do so.

2. At the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) as mentioned above, the victim guard I belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station Haak-dong Police Station, which was called out after having been reported 112 by the 112, recommended the Defendant to calculate the drinking value; and (b) among the victims of the above restaurant employees and multiple customers, the Defendant died of the flachie.

There must be no width.

Central Central Central Republic of Korea shall be discarded in the Republic of Korea.

In many cases, “the victims were openly insulting by openly obsting them at large times,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statute of limitations on respective statements made to G, I and J by the police;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of interference with business) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that his mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no same record as or higher than that of the suspension of execution, and that he does not repeat the same crime again;

the defendant's home environment, etc.

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;