beta
Text
1. The Defendant paid KRW 8,068,716 to the Plaintiff KRW 5% per annum from May 20, 2009 to March 8, 2012.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. (1) On May 20, 2009, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as damage and loss of the part, damage of the part, damage of the part in charge, damage of the part in charge, and loss of the part in charge, damage of the part in charge, and loss of the part in charge, damage of the part in charge, damage of the part in charge, and rupture of the part in charge, etc., which were closely sealed by the increase of the part in the part in the part in the part in charge of the part in the part in the part in charge of the part in the part in charge of the part in the part in charge of the part in charge of the part in
(hereinafter referred to as the "accident". The original type columns consisting of 24 parts of the Shesheshes return to what is, and then tightly tightly tightly tightly locked on the pole is an automated device that flabs the original body’s surface. When the plant is convered or partitioned into the body during the increase, the plant is likely to cause a defect to the original body or to tear. In this case, in principle, the plant operation shall be suspended, and the plant is cut off between the increase, or it shall be cut off, or assembled again after the rapid increase is removed, and the equipment is re-prefabricatedd after the rapid increase. The Plaintiff was tightly flabed in the shape of the moer’s operation while the aircraft is in operation.
Fidelity at the time of the Defendant’s work, the Plaintiff, including the above mother, was in charge of the 11 domestic automation mother in the Defendant’s workplace, and was in charge of the work of checking whether the machinery return normally and the body does not have anything above the original body.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, 5, Eul evidence 5, each of Gap evidence 12-1 to 4, witness D, E's testimony, the result of the CD verification by this court, the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant has installed the machinery that was severely injured upon the occurrence of an accident, such as the above mother flag, and had the plaintiff et al. work for the workers, such as the plaintiff, etc., the defendant will be the losses of the worker.