A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

seizure.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) on June 4, 2017, the Defendant 23:50, while drinking alcohol and communicating with the victim D(50) in front of the petition-gu Cheongju City on the street, the Defendant misunderstanding that the Defendant would have retired from office due to the victim, and putting the knife (32 cm in total length, 20 cm in length) of a dangerous article held on the bank, in his/her hand, on his/her hand, and her knife “h and down the death.”

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.

2. Around 02:00 on June 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) taken an investigation from the street room in front of the F convenience store in the petition-gu, Cheongju-si to the same case as the preceding paragraph; and (b) took a look at the victim for the same reason as the preceding paragraph while drinking the victim, and (c) taken five times the part of the victim’s left head on the left side of the victim’s plastic beer, which is a dangerous object for the same reason as that of the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant asserts that there was no fact that the Defendant knife the death or intimidation of the victim as knife the Defendant’s knife the death of the Victim G, H’s legal witness D, I’s legal statement D, and I’s legal statement D, investigation report (Listening to victim’s telephone statement) 112.

The victim D cited the Defendant’s knife and threatened by an investigative agency.

The statement was made by the police officer at the site, and the statement of H is supported by this.

D When the statement was changed to the effect that it is not memory in the court after the agreement with the defendant, it is difficult to believe the D's legal statement as it is, and at the time, it was located in that time.

I also fails to make a proper statement to the effect that he/she was aware of his/her memory in the court, so it is difficult to believe the content of the statement in the application of the statute).

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) and 258-2(1) and 257(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment for imprisonment;

2. Aggravation of concurrent crimes.