logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.09.21 2015고단2193
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, as the representative of the KY-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 101 Dong 806, the Defendant is an employer who is engaged in the booming manufacturing business using five full-time workers. Although he is an employer who pays wages, retirement allowances, etc. to D within 14 days from the date of occurrence of the cause of payment, he did not pay 3,81,949 won such as wages, retirement allowances, 3,341,691 won, and wages, etc. to E, 3,816,620 won such as retirement allowances, 5,000,000 won for retirement allowances, and 4,469,530 won such as wages, etc. to F, retirement allowances, 5,108,820 won totaling 25,548,610 won (i.e., wages, etc., totaling 12,098, 13,501 won

2. Provisions of applicable provisions to the facts charged in judgment: Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act, main sentence of Article 44 and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, and Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits on September 2, 2015, which are subsequent to prosecution under the proviso to Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits (Article 327(6)

arrow