The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all the instant crimes and reflects his depth on his mistake, and that the Defendant appears to have relatively little profits from the instant crime.

However, the crime of this case was committed in collusion with the Defendant’s employees in charge of information processing, such as B, etc., and obtained a total of 30,700,000 won from two victims by allowing them to enter information in collusion with the Defendant’s employees in charge of information processing, such as computer, etc. In light of the number and content of the crime, etc., the crime is very poor in view of the crime, and the crime is committed in a systematic and systematic manner, which actually causes damage to an unspecified number of victims. It is necessary to punish the Defendant with severe social harm. The Defendant committed the crime of this case on February 19, 2014, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution from the Busan District Court’s branch branch for the crime of Electronic Financial Transactions Act to be committed on June 27, 2014, which became final and conclusive on February 27, 2014, by considering that the agreement between the victims and the victims or on damage recovery to the present day, the Defendant’s motive, circumstance, and circumstances of the crime of this case, etc.

rather than the assertion of the prosecutor, it is deemed unfair because it is too unfortunate as argued by the prosecutor.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above argument is with merit, and the defendant's above argument is without merit.

3. Conclusion