logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.06.28 2018고단1603
절도등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, from the date of this decision to the date of this decision, each of the two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

As the Defendants came to know in the society, around January 2018, the victim F, who is the manager of the “E,” Defendant B’s “E,” instructed the Defendant B to withdraw and make a large amount of cash, and using the said cash to keep it in the office for a certain period of time, Defendant B stolen the cash owned by the victim and conspired to divide it into two parts.

On May 8, 2018, the Defendants, while making a mutual call on May 3, 2018, used in order for the said victim to deliver cash to G, who is a business customer, to take advantage of the fact that the said G office No. 202, Htel 202, which is the office of the said G, steals the bank that was cash in the said officetel, but Defendant B, along with the victim, entered the secret number of the locking device and entered the said officetel into the said officetel with the victim, carried out the cash room on the book, and then, they gathered the detailed method of crime, such as: (a) the clothes that the CCTV suffered in the course of committing the crime were not installed, making it difficult for the investigation agency to refund and throw away; and (b) making it difficult for the said victim to have the cash divided later; and (c) making it difficult for the Defendant B to do so.

In accordance with the foregoing Mosb above, the Defendants entered the above Matel 11:50 on May 8, 2018, and around 202 of Songpa-gu Seoul Htel 202, Defendant B left the bank under the direction of the victim F and 52 million won in cash, which was deposited in the bank, and provided meals with the victim. The Defendant A opened and intruded the above Matel mp gate by entering the password he notified in advance by other Defendant B, and then cut it with the above sib sib gate, which was cashed.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to intrude into the above Htel 202, which is a structure managed by the victim G, which is the land of the above F, and stolen KRW 52 million in cash owned by the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.

arrow