beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 23, 2016, around 02:45, the Defendant filed a 112 report on the underground parking lot in Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, 500 Eynam-dong, Taenam-dong, 115, at the expense of an agency engineer and charge. Upon receipt of the said report, the Defendant confirmed the details of the report after sending the report to the site by C and D, who are police officers belonging to B police units belonging to the Dong-dong Police Station B of Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Seoul-dong, and confirmed the details of the report. As a result, the Defendant did not receive the case
was made.
The defendant is dissatisfied with the complaint, and the above police officers “this spath, spath, spath, and spath, are sent to the above police officers. There is no spathing.
L. L. L. L. L. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. L. H.
And we also die.
“Intimidating the word “,” and following the right development of the said C to board the patrol vehicle in the course of the patrol team, Viart committed assault.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers who perform duties such as 112 reporting and civil petition treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;
1. Application of the law to the statements made by the police in relation to C and D;
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1548, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1448, Apr. 2, 2009) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da1548, Apr. 2, 2009)) (see, e.g., Decision 2009Da1448, Jan. 2, 2009)) (see, e., Decision 2009Da11448, Jan. 2, 20