1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s patent application invention (Evidence B No. 1) (1): The title of the invention in this case is an invention related to the nondestructive test field; the invention in this case is an invention related to the system in order to generate the intermediate range of the non-destructive vessels by using the CO2 Razzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

(No. 001) The existing Malaysias detection system is about 10 mJ (mJ) in response to the frequency of approximately 10 Hz (Hz) with an ordinary sn beam energy value for the sn beam beamer in the middle snific snific snific snific snific snife in the middle snific snific sn

(1) The patent application invention of this case was adopted as a solution to the task, recognizing that the patent application invention of this case is a technical task to provide the test method of the sn beam of other snife using high energy source snife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sife sifes

(4) Claim No. 1 【 Claim No. 1” (hereinafter “Composition No. 1”) 【 Claim No. 1 and 27 March 2015, 2015 (which was finally amended as of No. 2004) provides the CO2-rael beam with the basic strike of 9 U.S.C. and 11 U.S. dollars, with the energy from 1 week to 4.5 weeks, and with the basic strike of 9 U.S. dollars through 11 U.S. dollars (hereinafter “Subject element No. 2”); the process of guiding the high wave formed by C. CO2 s.S. s. s. s. s. 1 to c. s. 1 to c.s. 1 to c.