1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

According to the provisions of Articles 117 and 124 of the Civil Procedure Act, where it is deemed necessary to offer a security for the costs of lawsuit, such as when a claim is not sustainable due to a complaint, briefs and other records of trial, the court may order the plaintiff to offer a security for the costs of lawsuit ex officio, and if the plaintiff fails to offer a security within the period for providing such security, the court may dismiss the lawsuit by its judgment

On December 29, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for a retrial against the judgment subject to a retrial. On August 30, 2018, this court rejected the Plaintiff’s reappeal on the ground that the Plaintiff filed a reappeal with the lapse of one week from the date of receipt of the said order on September 13, 2018 on the grounds that the said order was necessary to provide security for litigation costs, and that the said order became final and conclusive around that time, pursuant to Articles 117(2) and 120(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, the Plaintiff rendered a ruling to provide security for litigation costs, and that the said ruling was served on the Plaintiff on September 3, 2018.

The fact that the plaintiff did not provide security even until the expiration of the period for providing security set forth in the above decision is clear in records.

Therefore, without holding any pleadings pursuant to the main sentence of Article 124 of the Civil Procedure Act, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.