logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.10.31 2018고정288
장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at KRW 40,00,00, even though he/she knew that the Defendant was a victim F of the Victim F that he/she stolen from the customer E, and acquired stolen goods at KRW 600,00,00, even though he/she knew that the Defendant was a stolen goods.

2. On September 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) purchased stolen goods at KRW 140,000 of the total price, knowing that the Defendant’s possession of a cellphone amounting to KRW 900,00,00 in an amount equivalent to KRW 7,00,00 in the market price of the victim’s G ownership that he/she stolen from his/her customer E, and KRW 80,000 in the market price of the victim’s H, by purchasing a cellphone amounting to KRW 140,00 in the total price, even though he/she knows that the Defendant was a stolen goods.

3. On October 17, 2017, the Defendant purchased stolen goods at KRW 70,000, even though he/she knew that he/she was the victim I who stolen from E, the victim I who was the customer, and acquired stolen goods at KRW 80,000, even though he/she was aware of the fact that he/she was the victim's personal phone 6's cellphone 6's cellphone.

4. On October 19, 2017, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by purchasing KRW 140,000 for 140,000 for a gallon, even though he/she was aware of the fact that the Defendant’s “Dgallon” operated by the Defendant in Ansan-si and 203, which he/she had stolen from E, a customer E, was the victim J.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and K;

1. Copy of the police statement concerning L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of F, I, and J of each of the statements;

1. Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 362(1) of the choice of punishment for each of the instant criminal facts (the Defendant stated that E was a mobile phone that he/she acquired while selling a mobile phone, and the first sale after September 12, 2017, around September 26, 2017, around October 17, 2017, and around October 19, 2017, the IMO values, etc. are not confirmed.

arrow