logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.19 2019구합50148
징계처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 25, 2010, the Plaintiff promoted to the First Lieutenant of the Marine Corps as a Staff sergeant of the Marine Corps, and thereafter served as the Grand Forces B of the Second Marine Corps from February 7, 2017 to May 15, 2018, respectively.

B. On September 20, 2018, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff for dismissal under the grounds for disciplinary action as specified in the following table:

(2) On October 2017, 201, the Plaintiff, the lower court determined that the Plaintiff, the lower court, the lower court, and the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duty to maintain dignity on January 1, 2017, and did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duty to maintain dignity. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duty to maintain dignity, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the duty to maintain dignity on January 1, 2017.

Although the Plaintiff was her married with the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff maintained the relationship between the two-month relationship from January 2018 to March 2018. During the said period, the Plaintiff she took advantage of the line, such as eating a schip or dividing the conversation on a car page.

In particular, on January 11, 2018, the Plaintiff and Hasari D, together with G hotel in Seoul Jung-gu, Seoul, have been making two-day travel. On January 2018, the two-day sexual intercourses occurred in the mutual incompeting tele located in the address of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-dong and the one-time sexual intercourses occurred on February 2018.

Accordingly, even though the plaintiff is a married person, the plaintiff violated his duty to maintain dignity by doing so.

2. On January 11, 2018, the Plaintiff in violation of a duty to maintain dignity (Intimidation) reveals that Hasa D talks about another person in G hotel in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the ground that Hasa had a talk about his/her relationship with him/her, and that Hasa D talks about Hasa, Hasa F and Hasa, Hasa, Hasa, Hasa, and Hasa.

arrow