Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On November 2015, the Defendant came to know of B through a mobile phone hold case, and knew that B was about the issue of debt repayment, the Defendant came to know of B’s personal information by accepting B’s resident registration certificate by “I want to help him/her get an additional loan on his/her own because he/she is going to go to a lending company,” and the Defendant applied for a siren service against A in his/her name and intended to have his/her parents installed and used it on his/her house.

1. Around November 2015, the Defendant: (a) had his/her cohabiting woman take a phone on the same scam scam in which he/she carries on a massage business; and (b) had the woman do so as if he/she was B himself/herself; and (c) requested the establishment of a massageer for 39 months to the effect that “the scam scambling person who caused the monthly usage fee of 49,900.”

On December 3, 2015, the Defendant signed the “B” in the signature column after entering the “B” in the column of the contract date in the name column, “B” in the name column, and the “B” in the relationship column with the contracting party, on the paper of the rental contract in which D, a delivery agent of the East-gu Daegu-gu T202 and the East Tyn Pene Operation Team, had written the “B” in the name column, “B”, and “B” in the signature column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a siren contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph 1, sent a forged rental contract to D, who is a delivery agent of the same kind, who is aware of the forgery, as if it were the document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on sirens contract;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of a falsified investigation document) and the choice of fines for criminal facts.