logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2018.10.05 2018고단492
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a foreigner of the nationality of Malaysia.

By misrepresenting to the investigation agency, the name influencies decided to commit the so-called thieves phishing crime, which steals money and valuables, by misrepresenting that “the personal information is exposed, and all the money deposited in a bank is expected to be damaged,” and when the victim brings cash in a certain place, the victim was able to do so.

The Defendant would offer KRW 50,00 in return for delivering to others with cash, etc. at a place to be informed of the inside and to which he/she is informed of the fact through “B,” a smartphone case.

“The proposal to the effect that it was presented, and accepted it, thereby contributing to the role of “collection” of a person who has no name.

On August 3, 2018, a name-free person assumes the phone call to the victim C (n, 63 years of age) on August 3, 2018, and assumes the identity of the investigator. The name-free person assumes the phone call to the victim C (n, 63 years of age) and "the contact employee illegally uses the credit card with the victim's personal information stolen and issued by using the credit card to another person."

Inasmuch as all the money in the passbook in the name of the victim should be withdrawn from the face of the above person, it is false to the effect that all the money in the name of the victim is withdrawn and stored in the laundry machine in which the victim resides, and that the money is stored in the restaurant where the victim resides, the victim shall withdraw KRW 7.2 million and be placed in the laundry machine, and the victim shall be induced to be in the part of the victim's residence, and then the defendant called the "B" call to the restaurant where the victim resides, and ordered the defendant to hold cash within the laundry machine where the victim resides.

Accordingly, the Defendant came to the “E cafeteria” where the victim in Ansan-si D is residing in the same day, and the above restaurant is used in the front.

arrow