A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Criminal facts

On September 28, 2001, the defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter referred to as "defendant") were sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Thereof (special rape, etc.) in the branch court of the Gwangju District Court in the Gwangju District Court on September 28, 2001. On June 12, 2008, he was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Thereof (special rape) in the branch court of the Gwangju District Court on June 12, 2008, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gpool prison on October 8, 201. On August 12, 2014, the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 22, 2014.

[2] The Defendant, on July 2013, had the father of the Victim C (V, 17 years of age) left the family of the Victim D and the Victim D, who had been staying in the family of the Victim C around the end of July 2013.

On August 8, 2013, the Defendant committed an indecent act by using the victim’s state of resistance which was unable to resist, because the victim was her in the room of the victim, by inserting her hand into the victim’s her part, and her part was her part.

[Judgment of the court below] The defendant committed a sexual crime against a person under the age of 19 and committed a sexual crime within 10 years after he/she was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a sexual crime, and committed a sexual crime on two or more occasions, thereby constituting a sexual crime. The defendant committed a sexual crime against a person under the age of 19 and is likely to recommit a sexual crime

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Each statement of the witness E and F in the second public trial records [the victim was locked by the investigative agency from the time of this case to the time of this court, but the victim was locked, citing the abnormal sense, so the defendant consistently and specifically made a consistent statement to the effect that he was knick by inserting his hand into his own seat, and the victim’s vegetable F.